ENS Founder’s Solo Vote Blocks Security Council Renewal, Sparks DAO Backlash

Ethereum Name Service founder Nick Johnson single-handedly blocked the renewal of the ENS DAO’s Security Council on June 30, 2026, using roughly 3.26 million self-delegated ENS tokens, about 50% of the active voting supply, according to Crypto Briefing. The move has triggered community proposals calling for the dissolution of the DAO altogether.

The Security Council, the body tasked with overseeing governance integrity within the ENS ecosystem, had a mandate set to expire on July 24, 2026. A draft proposal sought to expand the Council to eight members under a stricter 5-of-8 voting threshold, but Johnson’s opposing vote effectively killed the renewal before it could take effect, Crypto Briefing reports.

A contested proposal preceded the vote

The Security Council vote followed a separate proposal introduced on June 19, 2026, that would have shifted treasury management and day-to-day operational control away from the DAO and toward the ENS Foundation, a Cayman Islands-based entity that already works alongside ENS Labs. Under that plan, a five-seat Foundation board would handle daily decisions while tokenholders would retain theoretical authority over protocol upgrades and director appointments, according to the report.

The Foundation empowerment proposal remains under discussion, and no formal dissolution vote has been scheduled as of early July, Crypto Briefing notes. But the community reaction to Johnson blocking the Security Council renewal was described as swift, with multiple proposals surfacing to dissolve the DAO and distribute remaining treasury funds, and some pushing to revoke the DAO’s upgrade authority entirely.

Token concentration traces back to the 2021 airdrop

The concentration of voting power that made Johnson’s unilateral block possible has roots in how ENS distributed its token supply when it launched in November 2021. Only 25% of the total 100 million ENS tokens were airdropped to .eth domain registrants based on their registration history as of October 31, 2021, according to Crypto Briefing. The remaining 75 million tokens were allocated elsewhere, leaving significant supply concentrated outside the broader community.

That structural imbalance is now central to the criticism aimed at ENS governance. The Security Council was designed specifically as a check on concentrated power, and using that same concentrated power to block its renewal has drawn comparisons to a chief executive dissolving a board of directors over a strategic disagreement.

Market reaction remains muted so far

ENS tokens were trading at approximately $4.33 as of early July 2026, giving the project a market capitalization of around $175 million, according to Crypto Briefing. The Security Council renewal has formally failed on-chain, while talks over the Foundation empowerment proposal continue without a set timeline for resolution.

The episode raises broader questions for token-based governance systems that concentrate large voting stakes with founders or early insiders, a design flaw that critics argue can undermine the decentralization these systems are meant to embody.

Read more: Binance CEO Warns MiCA’s Promise Hinges on Consistent EU Implementation